Dynamic Governance Strategy in Pollution and Damage Control Patterns in the Citarum Riverside (DAS)
Main Article Content
Abstract
The pattern of pollution and damage control in the Citarum Riverside (DAS) carried out by the Regional Government of West Java Province has not been optimal because the environment and water around the river flow are still polluted for two decades. This research aimed to examine the dynamic capabilities of local governments as a positive step to restore the glory of the Citarum River. The research method used qualitative methods, data collection techniques used observation, and the data only refers to secondary data. It was conducting analysis used the Systemic Literature Review (SLR) method to map previous research and to found a novelty from this research using three databases. They were Taylor and Francis, Emerald and Science Direct. The theory was Dynamic Governance by Neo & Chen, focusing on competency dimensions of Thinking Ahead, Thinking Again, and Thinking Across. The results were whole the Regional Government of West Java Province has moved in a dynamic direction because it has created a variety of innovative policies and programs, as a form of innovation from the realization of the Thinking Ahead dimension. The establishment of a policy base related to normalization of the Citarum River consisting of presidential and governor regulations and The existence of new dynamics including the involvement of the ulemas as actors in the revitalization process of the Citarum River also take a part on it. Realization of the Thinking Again dimension, namely the running of the Citarum River normalization business programs that refer to regional policies. Then the realization of the Thinking Across dimension is the initiative of the West Java Provincial Government to adopt the pentahelix model in conducting collaborations related to the improvement of the Citarum River.
Downloads
Article Details
References
Agaton, M., Setiawan, Y., & H Effendi -. (2016). Land use/land cover change detection in an urban watershed: a case study of upper Citarum Watershed, West Java Province, Indonesia. Procedia Environmental Sciences. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878029616300068
Badan Pusat Statistik Lingkungan Hidup Indonesia. (2018). Pengelolaan Sampah di Indonesia.
Bornemann, B., Sohre, A., & Burger, P. (2017). Future governance of individual energy consumption behavior change-A framework for reflexive designs. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.040
Brotestes Panjaitan, R., Sumartono, S., Sarwono, S., & Saleh, C. (2019). The role of central government and local government and the moderating effect of good governance on forest fire policy in Indonesia. Benchmarking, 26(1), 147–159. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-12-2017-0336
Brunner, P. H., Wien, T. U., & Fellner, J. (2007). Setting priorities for waste in developing countries Establishing the Scientific Base for a Landfill Training & Research Centre in Indonesia | ESTReC View project Transformation of Cities into a Low Carbon Future and its Impact on Urban Metabolism, Environment, and Society (TransLoC) View project. Journals.Sagepub.Com, 25(3), 234–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X07078296
Calzada, I., & Cowie, P. (2017). Beyond smart and data-driven city-regions? rethinking stakeholder-helixes strategies. Regions Magazine. https://doi.org/10.1080/13673882.2017.11958675
Cheema, G., & Rondinelli, D. (2007). Decentralizing governance: emerging concepts and practices. https://www.google.com/books?hl=id&lr=&id=cZgeUT4DSfUC&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=ecentralizing+Governance+Emerging+Concepts+and+Practices.+DC:+Brookings+Institution+Press.&ots=Egreb8oIVM&sig=iJtg9qOKpenIUQzsWlJYqVBgPdg
Christensen, T. H. (2010). Introduction to Waste Management. In Solid Waste Technology & Management (Vol. 1, pp. 1–16). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470666883.ch1
Cornforth, C., Hayes, J. P., & Vangen, S. (2015). Nonprofit–Public Collaborations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 44(4), 775–795. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764014532836
Creswell, J. W., Hanson, W. E., Clark Plano, V. L., & Morales, A. (2007). Qualitative Research Designs. The Counseling Psychologist, 35(2), 236–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006287390
Demirbas, A. (2011). Waste management, waste resource facilities and waste conversion processes. Energy Conversion and Management, 52(2), 1280–1287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2010.09.025
Domingo, J. L., & Nadal, M. (2009). Domestic waste composting facilities: A review of human health risks. In Environment International (Vol. 35, Issue 2, pp. 382–389). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2008.07.004
Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur011
Farazmand, A. (2012). Sound Governance: Engaging Citizens through Collaborative Organizations. Public Organization Review, 12(3), 223–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-012-0186-7
Gulbrandsen, L. H. (2014). Dynamic governance interactions: Evolutionary effects of state responses to non-state certification programs. Regulation and Governance, 8(1), 74–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12005
Han, Z., Liu, Y., Zhong, M., Shi, G., Li, Q., Zeng, D., Zhang, Y., Fei, Y., & Xie, Y. (2018). Influencing factors of domestic waste characteristics in rural areas of developing countries. In Waste Management (Vol. 72, pp. 45–54). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.11.039
Kumar, A., & Samadder, S. R. (2017). A review on technological options of waste to energy for effective management of municipal solid waste. In Waste Management (Vol. 69, pp. 407–422). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.08.046
Michels, A., & De Graaf, L. (2017). Examining citizen participation: local participatory policymaking and democracy revisited. Local Government Studies, 43(6), 875–881. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2017.1365712
Neo, B. S., & Chen, G. (2007). Dynamic governance: Embedding culture, capabilities and change in Singapore. In Dynamic Governance: Embedding Culture, Capabilities and Change in Singapore. World Scientific Publishing Co. https://doi.org/10.1142/6458
O’Toole, L. J. (2015). Networks and Networking: The Public Administrative Agendas. Public Administration Review, 75(3), 361–371. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12281
Ramstad, E. (2009). Expanding innovation system and policy an organizational perspective. Policy Studies, 30(5), 533–553. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442870903208551
Rio Tausikal. (2019). Upaya Indonesia Bersihkan Sungai Terkotor di Dunia (1). VOA Indonesia.
Sergeeva, N. (2019). Towards more flexible approach to governance to allow innovation: the case of UK infrastructure. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 13(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-10-2018-0216
Sullivan, H., Williams, P., & Jeffares, S. (2012). Leadership for Collaboration: Situated agency in practice. Public Management Review, 14(1), 41–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2011.589617
Sutadian, A. D., Muttil, N., Yilmaz, A. G., & Perera, B. J. C. (2018). Development of a water quality index for rivers in West Java Province, Indonesia. Ecological Indicators, 85,966–982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.11.049
Thomson, A. M., & Perry, J. L. (2006). Collaboration processes: Inside the black box. In Public Administration Review (Vol. 66, Issue SUPPL. 1, pp. 20–32). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00663.x
Yoada, R. M., Chirawurah, D., & Adongo, P. B. (2014). Domestic waste disposal practice and perceptions of private sector waste management in urban Accra. BMC Public Health, 14(1), 697. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-697