Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 375 Download : 1197

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji berbagai permasalahan pembangunan yang mencakup potret minimnya
partisipasi masyarakat desa dalam aktivitas perencanaan, alokasi sumber daya, pelaksanaan maupun
pengawasannya. Dalam eksistensinya, problem pembangunan desa juga terjadi pada desa pesisir di
sekitar wilayah perbatasan dan terluar Indonesia, sehingga secara signifikan menginterpretasikannya
sebagai inefektivitas pembangunan desa pesisir yang memotivasi dan menarik minat perhatian para
peneliti di Indonesia. Berbagai penelitian banyak dilakukan, namun belum ditemukan penelitian yang
memetakan pemikiran tentang efektivitas pembangunan desa pesisir secara sistematis (Riset Indeks,
Inklusif Filtrasi dan Pemetaan). Studi ini mempergunakan pendekatan kualitatif dan secara teknis data
yang dikumpulkan melalui filtrasi atau screening of paper terhadap 99 topik penelitian yang relevan dan
selanjutnya dianalisis menggunakan teknik systematic literature review yang menghasilkan diskusi dan
bahasan agregasi tentang arah penelitian kontemplatif yang dilakukan melalui analisis sistematis
terhadap 21 topik penelitian terindeks yang telah dikumpulkan menggunakan teknik screening of papers
dan dikelompokkan berdasarkan klasifikasi tertentu. Hasil analisis data penelitian inklusif secara
sistematis, menjelaskan bahwa letak penelitian yang concern terhadap proses membangun desa secara
efektif mencakup perilaku agen pembangunan desa pesisir saat ini masih minim sehingga memerlukan
upaya pngukuran keberhasilan proses pembangunan yang tepat bagi desa pesisir.

Keywords

Systematic Mapping Review Efketivitas Pembangunan Desa Pesisir

Article Details

Author Biography

Armauliza Septiawan, Universitas Padjadjaran

Dosen Program Studi Administrasi Publik 

How to Cite
Septiawan, A. (2018). Aplikasi Systematic Mapping Review Sebagai Upaya Pengukuran Efektivitas Pembangunan Desa Pesisir Natuna. JIP (Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan) : Kajian Ilmu Pemerintahan Dan Politik Daerah, 3(2), 149-170. https://doi.org/10.24905/jip.3.2.2018.149-170

References

  1. Adisasmita, R. (2006). Pembangunan Desa dan Kota.
  2. Ben-Ner, A., & Ren, T. (2008). Does Organization Ownership Matter ?Structure and Performance in For-Profit, Nonprofit and Local Government Nursing Homes.
  3. Bishop, S. W. (2007). Linking Nonprofit Capacity to Effectiveness in the NewPublic Management Era: The Case ofCommunity Action Agencies. Stateand Local Government Review, 39(3),144152.https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323X0703900303
  4. Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1998).Qualitative research in education: Anintroduction to theory and methods(3rd ed.). Needham Heights, MA:Allyn & Bacon, 2194.
  5. Bourgon, J. (2007). Responsive,responsible and respectedgovernment: Towards a New PublicAdministration theory. InternationalReview of Administrative Sciences,73(1), 7–26.https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852307075686
  6. Cameron, K. (1980). Critical Questions in Assessing Organizational Effectiveness. Organizaional Dynamics, 66–80.
  7. Cooper, H. (1998). Cooper.pdf (SecondEdi). Sage Publication.
  8. Coulter, P. B. (2015). Effec- Organizational tiveness in the Public Sector : The Example of Municipal Fire Protection 24(1), 65–81.
  9. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Educational Research (4th Editio). Lincoln:University of Nebraska.
  10. Cronin, Patricia, Ryan, Frances, Coughlan,
  11. M. (2004). Undertaking a Literature Review. Doing Postgraduate Research, 4(4), 411–429. https://doi.org/10.1177/107808747000500401
  12. Dehart-Davis, L. (2009). Green tape: Atheory of effective organizational
  13. rules. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(2), 361–384.https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mun004
  14. Goodsell, C. T. (2018). Leisha DeHart-Davis, Creating Effective Rules in Public Sector Organizations,00(expected), 1–3.https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12944
  15. Herman, R. (1990). Methodological Issues an Studying the Effectivness ofNongovernmental and NonprofitOrganizations. Nonprofit andVoluntary Sector Quarterly, (19), 293–306.
  16. Herman, R. D., & Renz, D. O. (1999).Nonprofit and Voluntary SectorQuarterly Theses on NonprofitOrganizational Effectiveness, 28(2),107–126.https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764099282001
  17. Herman, R. D., & Renz, D. O. (2000). Boardpractices Of Especially Effective andLess Effective....pdf, 30(2), 146–160.
  18. Herman, R. D., & Renz, D. O. (2004). DoingThings Right: Effectiveness in LocalNonprofit Organizations, A PanelStudy. Public Administration Review,64(6), 694–704.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00416.x
  19. Ilmu, J., Holidin, D., & Handini, R. S. (2014).Sound Governance Analysis in the Innovation of Traditional Market
  20. Revitalization and Street Vendors Management. International Journal OfAdministrative Science &Organization, 21(1), 17–26.https://doi.org/10.20476/jbb.v21i1.4040
  21. Indonesia. (2014). UU No.6 Tahun 2014Tentang Desa, (1), 103. Retrievedfromhttp://www.dpr.go.id/dokjdih/document/uu/UU_2014_6.pdf
  22. Kitchenham, B., Pearl Brereton, O.,Budgen, D., Turner, M., Bailey, J., &
  23. Linkman, S. (2009). Systematicliterature reviews in softwareengineering - A systematic literaturereview. Information and Software Technology, 51(1), 7–15.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2008.09.009
  24. Kruyen, P. M., & van Genugten, M. (2017).Creativity in local government:Definition and determinants. PublicAdministration, 95(3), 825–841.https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.1233
  25. 2 Lan, Z., & Anders, K. K. (2000). AParadigmatic View of ContemporaryPublic Administration Research: AnEmpirical Test. Administration &
  26. Society, 32(2), 138–165.https://doi.org/10.1177/00953990022019380
  27. Lecy, J. D., Schmitz, H. P., & Swedlund, H.(2012). Non-Governmental and Notfor-Profit OrganizationalEffectiveness: A Modern Synthesis.Voluntas, 23(2), 434–457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-011-9204-6
  28. Levy, Y., & Ellis, T. J. (2006). A systemsapproach to conduct an effectiveliterature review in support of
  29. information systems research. Informing Science, 9, 181–211.https://doi.org/10.1049/cp.2009.0961
  30. Liket, K. C., & Maas, K. (2015). NonprofitOrganizational Effectiveness:Analysis of Best Practices. Nonprofitand Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 44(2),268–296.https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764013510064
  31. Menteri Desa Pembangunan Daerah Tertinggal Transmigrasi. (2016).
  32. Peraturan Menteri Desa, Pembangunan Daerah Tertinggal,Dan Transmigrasi Republik Indonesia
  33. Nomor 2 Tahun 2016 Tentang Indeks Desa Membangun, 6–8.
  34. Mihaiu, D., Opreana, A., & Cristescu, M. P.(2010). Efficiency, Effectiveness and Performance of the Public Sector.Romanian Journal of EconomicForecasting, 13(4), 132–147.Retrieved fromhttp://www.ipe.ro/rjef/rjef4_10/rjef4_10_10.pdf
  35. Nagendrababu, V., Pulikkotil, S. J., Sultan,O. S., Jayaraman, J., & Peters, O. A.(2018). Methodological and Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses inEndodontics. Journal of Endodontics,44(6), 903–913.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2018.02.013
  36. Nobbie, P. D., & Brudney, J. L. (2003).Testing the Implementation, Board]Performance, and OrganizationalEffectiveness of the PolicyGovernance Model in NonprofitBoards of Directors. Nonprofit andVoluntary Sector Quarterly, 32(4),571–595.https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764003257460Peraturan Pemerintah Republik IndonesiaNomor 43 Tahun 2014. PERATURANPEMERINTAH REPUBLIK INDONESIANOMOR 43 TAHUN 2014 TENTANGPERATURAN PELAKSANAANUNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 6 TAHUN2014 TENTANG DESA (2014).
  37. Perry, J. L., & Kraemer, K. L. (1986).ARTICLES : Probing the Field. PublicAdministration Review, 46(3), 215–226. Retrieved fromhttp://www.jstor.org/stable/3110436Petersen, K., Feldt, R., Mujtaba, S., &
  38. Mattsson, M. (2008). Systematic Mapping Studies in Software Engineering. 12Th InternationalConference on Evaluation andAssessment in Software Engineering,17, 10.https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218194007003112
  39. Piper, A. R. J. (2013). How to write asystematic literature review : a guide
  40. for medical students. In National AMR, Fostering Medical Research (pp.1–8). University of Edinburgh.
  41. Rainey, H. G., & Steinbauer, P. (1999). Galloping Elephants : Developing Elements of a Theory of EffectiveGovernment Organizations, 9, 1–32.
  42. Shucksmith, M. (2015). Future directions in rural development: Executive
  43. summary. Retrieved from http://www.carnegieuktrust.org.uk/CMSPages/GetFile.aspx?guid=545a7523-4da8-4ff7-95e6-dd912abc6373
  44. Siddaway, A. (2014). What is a systematic literature review and how do I do
  45. one? University of Stirling, (Ii), 1–13.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmwh.2009.03.017
  46. Siswanto. (2010). Systematic ReviewSebagai Metode Penelitian UntkMensintesis Hasil-Hasil Penelitian.Buletin Penelitian Sistem Kesehatan,13(4), 326–333.
  47. Stark, A. (2011). The distinction betweenpublic, nonprofit, and for-profit:Revisiting the “core legal” approach.Journal of Public AdministrationResearch and Theory, 21(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq008
  48. Tutik, R., & Hariyati, S. (2009). Sistematicreview theory. Jurnal Keperawatan Indonesia, 13, 124–132.
  49. Willems, J., Boenigk, S., & Jegers, M. (2014).Seven Trade-offs in MeasuringNonprofit Performance andEffectiveness. Voluntas, 25(6), 1648–1670.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-014-9446-1
  50. Wolf, P. J. (1993). A Case Survey ofBureaucratic Effectiveness in U . S . Cabinet Agencies : Preliminary Results 1, 161–181.